Dickson rejects pension bill
Femi Folaranmi, Yenagoa
Bayelsa State Governor, Seriake Dickson, yesterday, bowed to pressure and declined to sign the controversial Pension Bill for governors, deputy governors and House of Assembly members.
There have been outrage in Bayelsa State and beyond, since the lawmakers passed the bill through First and Second Reading within hours and was passed into law within four hours.
The bill had stipulated monthly life pension of N500,000 for the speaker, N200,000 for the deputy speaker and N100,000 for other members
However, Commissioner for Information, Daniel Iworiso-Markson, who said Dickson has declined assent to the bill, disclosed that the governor held consultations with members of the House of Assembly at his country home, Toru-Orua, at the weekend and explained reasons he declined assent.
Dickson said the provision of the bill is not consistent with Section 124 of the constitution of the country as amended.
He quoted Dickson as having argued that while the lawmakers lacked the powers to expand the category of public servants who should be entitled to pension, he had to withhold assent to the bill because the state which was bedevilled with a lot of challenges in spite of its low internally generated revenue base and unstable earnings from the oil economy was the only state out of Nigeria’s 36 to come up with such a bill.
The governor stressed that he was guided in the decision by the principle that government should not be for a select class of the privileged in the society, and would not discard it over seven years into his administration.
“While I agree that the Assembly can adjust the quantum of pension payable to persons entitled to pension, I am not convinced that the House has powers to add to the categories of pensionable public officers.
“Evidently, there is no record of any other state in this country that has expanded the categories of pensionable public officers to include lawmakers.
“I do not agree that Bayelsa which is coping with all the myriads of issues and challenges, with our low internally generated revenue base and the unpredictable oil economy, should be the first to initiate this.
“It is my philosophy that government should not be for a select few. In the last seven years, my actions and decisions which have sometimes elicited opposition from the elite who have been feeding fat on the resources of our state, have been marked by this singular disposition of mine.
“Therefore, I am unable to assent to this bill which in my view aims to expand and consolidate the class interest of a privileged few,” he declared.